<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;Finding More on Julia&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.epcrowe.com/archives/549/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.epcrowe.com/archives/549</link>
	<description>Genealogy, Writing, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libbi</title>
		<link>http://blog.epcrowe.com/archives/549#comment-14286</link>
		<dc:creator>Libbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epcrowe.com/archives/549#comment-14286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, PRF is just enough information to get you excited and frustrated, most often. Still, I always check it. You never know....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, PRF is just enough information to get you excited and frustrated, most often. Still, I always check it. You never know&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Harris</title>
		<link>http://blog.epcrowe.com/archives/549#comment-14282</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 08:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epcrowe.com/archives/549#comment-14282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liz, looks like you are making some progress.  I wish that when the PRF was first introduced they would have required sources (as in citation/documentation); I have found the names, occasionally, of the submitter.  I always try to contact these folks, but most of the time, I don&#039;t really find anyone who wants to collaborate with me or else the email address isn&#039;t current.

Still, we love those clues!  Some will hopefully, pan out.  And I generally find that the birth years on the census are the least accurate when compared with other sources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, looks like you are making some progress.  I wish that when the PRF was first introduced they would have required sources (as in citation/documentation); I have found the names, occasionally, of the submitter.  I always try to contact these folks, but most of the time, I don&#8217;t really find anyone who wants to collaborate with me or else the email address isn&#8217;t current.</p>
<p>Still, we love those clues!  Some will hopefully, pan out.  And I generally find that the birth years on the census are the least accurate when compared with other sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
